By Alex Biryukov, Christophe De Cannière, Michaël Quisquater (auth.), Matt Franklin (eds.)
Crypto 2004, the twenty fourth Annual Crypto convention, used to be backed by means of the Int- nationwide organization for Cryptologic examine (IACR) in cooperation with the IEEE machine Society Technical Committee on safety and privateness and the pc technology division of the collage of California at Santa Barbara. this system committee accredited 33 papers for presentation on the conf- ence. those have been chosen from a complete of 211 submissions. each one paper obtained not less than 3 self sustaining reports. the choice method incorporated an online dialogue part, and a one-day application committee assembly at manhattan U- versity. those lawsuits comprise up-to-date types of the 33 approved papers. The authors had a couple of weeks to revise them, aided by means of reviews from the reviewers. even if, the revisions weren't subjected to any editorial overview. Theconferenceprogramincludedtwoinvitedlectures.VictorShoup’sinvited speak used to be a survey on selected ciphertext defense in public-key encryption. Susan Landau’s invited speak was once entitled “Security, Liberty, and digital Commu- cations”. Her prolonged summary is incorporated in those complaints. We persisted the culture of a Rump consultation, chaired through Stuart Haber. these displays (always brief, frequently critical) are usually not incorporated here.
Read or Download Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2004: 24th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 15-19, 2004. Proceedings PDF
Best international conferences and symposiums books
This quantity includes a set of papers offered on the Workshop on details defense, held in Moscow, Russia in December 1993. The sixteen completely refereed papers via the world over recognized scientists chosen for this quantity supply a thrilling standpoint on errors regulate coding, cryptology, and speech compression.
The layout of complicated artifacts and structures calls for the cooperation of multidisciplinary layout groups utilizing a number of advertisement and non-commercial engineering instruments corresponding to CAD instruments, modeling, simulation and optimization software program, engineering databases, and knowledge-based platforms. members or person teams of multidisciplinary layout groups often paintings in parallel and individually with a number of engineering instruments, that are positioned on diversified websites, usually for rather decades.
This publication offers the court cases of the operating convention at the societal and organizational implications for info platforms of social inclusion. The contributed papers discover know-how layout and use in businesses, and view the approaches that engender social exclusion in addition to the problems that derive from it.
- Agents Breaking Away: 7th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAMAW '96 Eindhoven, The Netherlands, January 22–25, 1996 Proceedings
- Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems: 5th International Workshop, W2GIS 2005, Lausanne, Switzerland, December 15-16, 2005. Proceedings
- Computer Vision in Human-Computer Interaction: ICCV 2005 Workshop on HCI, Beijing, China, October 21, 2005. Proceedings
- Topics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 2007: The Cryptographers’ Track at the RSA Conference 2007, San Francisco, CA, USA, February 5-9, 2007. Proceedings
Additional resources for Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2004: 24th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 15-19, 2004. Proceedings
We say that the Linear Assumption (LA) holds in if no algorithm has advantage at least in solving the Decision Linear problem in In the full version of the paper we show that the Decision Linear Assumption holds in generic bilinear groups. Linear Encryption. The Decision Linear problem gives rise to the Linear encryption (LE) scheme, a natural extension of ElGamal encryption. Unlike ElGamal encryption, Linear encryption can be secure even in groups where a DDH-deciding algorithm exists. In this scheme, a user’s public key is a triple of generators her private key is the exponents such that To encrypt a message choose random values and output the triple To recover the message from an encryption , the user computes By a natural extension of the proof of security of ElGamal, LE is semantically secure against a chosen-plaintext attack, assuming Decision-LA holds.
D. Davies and S. Murphy, Pairs and Triplets of DES S-Boxes, Journal of Cryptology, vol. 8, Nb. 1, pp. 1-25, 1995. 8. Data Encryption Standard (DES), Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS PUB) 46-3, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1999). pdf 9. C. Harpes, G. Kramer, and J. Massey: A Generalization of Linear Cryptanalysis and the Applicability of Matsui’s Piling-up Lemma, Eurocrypt’95, LNCS 921, Springer, pp. 24-38. ps TEAM LinG Feistel Schemes and Bi-linear Cryptanalysis 35 10.
Matsui: The First Experimental Cryptanalysis of the Data Encryption Standard, Crypto’94, LNCS 839, Springer, pp. 1-11, 1994. 28. Alfred J. Menezes, Paul C. van Oorschot, Scott A. Vanstone: Handbook of Applied Cryptography; CRC Press, 1996. 29. J. Patarin, How to construct pseudorandom and super pseudorandom permutations from one single pseudorandom function. Eurocrypt’92,Springer, pp. 256-266, 1992. 30. Adi Shamir: On the security of DES, Crypto’85, LNCS 218, Springer, pp. 280-281, 1985. TEAM LinG 36 A Nicolas T.
Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2004: 24th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 15-19, 2004. Proceedings by Alex Biryukov, Christophe De Cannière, Michaël Quisquater (auth.), Matt Franklin (eds.)